#Rawtherapee vs darktable 2018 upgrade
#Rawtherapee vs darktable 2018 software
#Rawtherapee vs darktable 2018 mac

You have nothing to lose other than your monthly subscription payment Take some time to browse the manual, view some of the many excellent (along with the 'crappy') YouTube videos, and lurk or participate in the User Forum and I can assure you that you'll not only become confident that darktable is a very powerful and capable raw processor ( which in some cases actually exceeds the capabilities of the hyped commercial stuff) but also that it's surprisingly a very easy-to-use tool once you become familiar with it. The same can usually be said of any unfamiliar software. All have long learning curves.Stan, please don't be put off by such subjective statements.

#Rawtherapee vs darktable 2018 software

the software has been put together in a way that is not particularly user friendly. Unfortunately, like a lot of the FOSS tools out there including RawTherapee, Gimp, etc. I usually do this for the basecurve, as I don't like the one 'basecurve' (with exact curve depending on your camera), 'sharpen', and a few others. 'exposure' or 'local contrast').ĭT always applies a few modules automatically when working with raw files: 'whitebalance' (with camera WB), 'demosaic',

Same module (useful in combination with masks for e.g. The only place where you can explicitly change the order of application is between copies of the That is shown in the 'history stack', but again, that order has nothing to do with the order in which the modules are applied onĮxport of the finished image.

That reduces the complexity already quite a lot.Īlso, DT always applies the active modules in a fixed order, independant of the order in which you do your edits. Obvious, as you stay very close to the basic algorithms used in each module.īut you have the option to adapt the GUI by hiding modules you don't use, and collecting the most used modules There is a learning curve, as there are a lot of modules and options. Understand lumnance masks correctly, both L channels should give you something close to that. The others provide HSL channels (and RGB). Working in Lab, one of the avaiable channels is L (next to a and b). The masking options depend on the exact module, as different modules work in different colour spaces (LAb or RBG).ĭarktable has an option called 'parametric masks', where masking is done on channel values. Single layer images, files tend to be much larger than 16-bit PNGs). (Btw, I don't understand that preference for 16-bit TIFF for What Affinity can handle, nor what its preferred format is. For exporting, there are quite aįew options, from jpeg, png (8 or 16 bit/channel), through TIFF (16/32 bit) to several floating point formats. Importing is easy (select directory, and everything gets loaded into DTs database). After trying a few, I found I preferred Darktable. Perhaps if i had stuck with I would have found uses for it.ĭarktable is the raw processor/editor I use (with GIMP for the stuff DT can't handle), but under Linux (so Affinity etc.Īre not available). It just didn't offer me anything I couldn't do in C1.

Which is not to say it isn't a good system. Admittedly as I enter old age my 'lets learn something new mode' doesn't work so well but I found the learning curve somewhat steep. When I was using v11 I tried out Dark Table as an easier to use Gimp. How steep is the DT learning curve? Are there any hints / suggestions to facilitate learning a new tool? The latest version of C1 has a Luma mask that produces very good results, is there a similar capability with DT?Ĥ. Are there any problems with 'Round Tripping' from DT to Affinity Photo?ģ.

#Rawtherapee vs darktable 2018 mac

How easy is it to import images from a Mac into DT?Ģ. I have a few specific questions and am looking for general advice and comments.ġ. BTW, I am a very happy with C1 performance and I have become quite comfortable using it.

#Rawtherapee vs darktable 2018 upgrade

Today, I noticed that DT has a new release (2.6.0) and since free is considerably less expensive than $149 (the most recent C1 upgrade price), I am trying to evaluate viable alternatives. I was a long time Lightroom user (v1 thru 6) and about a year ago I started using Capture One as my raw processor I am currently using version 12.